- Gavin Newsom’s spouse Jennifer Siebel Newsom testified once more in Harvey Weinstein’s LA rape trial.
- On Tuesday, Siebel Newsom confronted intense cross-examination from Weinstein’s attorneys.
- She was grilled about her interviews with authorities, and the ‘pleasure sounds’ she brought up on Monday.
Harvey Weinstein’s legal professional pressed California governor Gavin Newsom’s spouse Jennifer Siebel Newsom at Weinstein’s Los Angeles trial on rape expenses Tuesday, trying to poke holes in her testimony throughout a testy cross-examination.
Siebel Newsom took the stand for the second day on Tuesday, clashing with Weinstein legal professional Mark Werksman via his speedy line of questioning, which centered round Newsom’s allegation and former testimony that Weinstein raped her on the Peninsula Lodge in Beverly Hills in 2005.
Weinstein — who’s already serving a 23-year sentence after a separate trial in New York — is currently standing trial in LA on 7 counts of sexual assault, stemming from the allegations of 5 totally different ladies who say he abused them in motels between 2004 and 2013. Weinstein denies the allegations and has pleaded not responsible.
Werksman zeroed in on what Siebel Newsom informed Los Angeles District Legal professional investigators and a grand jury in 2020 concerning the alleged assault, additionally prodding her testimony from Monday. Siebel Newsom informed Werksman that she initially thought her declare was past the statute of limitations.
“While you informed the police, do you assume that the issues that you just informed police would result in the submitting of prison expenses?” Werksman requested, based on the trial pool report. “I actually was simply telling my reality and I did not know what the result was going to be,” Siebel Newsom replied.
Siebel Newsom mentioned beneath questioning Tuesday that she was not sure if she informed police that in an effort to exit the assault, she helped Weinstein ejaculate, as she testified yesterday.
“Typically issues are in my head and I am unable to bear in mind whether or not I’ve mentioned them or not,” Siebel Newsom mentioned.
“Yesterday you talked about having nightmares. Have you ever had a troublesome time really discerning what occurred in a nightmare and what really occurred in a bed room on the Peninsula?” Werksman requested. “No, no.” Siebel Newsom answered.
“During the last a number of days my consumer, Jane Doe 4, took the very troublesome and painful step to publicly recount her sexual assault by the hands of Harvey Weinstein. She knew that it might need been simpler to maintain the reminiscence of her 2005 assault buried, however she couldn’t,” Siebel Newsom’s legal professional Elizabeth Fegan informed Insider in a press release. “All through her testimony she demonstrated large energy and resolve in telling her reality and stood quick as Weinstein’s protection crew ruthlessly tried to discredit her.”
On Monday, Siebel Newsom testified that to exit the scenario, she made “pleasure sounds” and helped Weinstein ejaculate together with her hand, then managed to decorate and go away the room. By way of Werksman’s questions, Siebel Newsom had taken challenge with Werksman’s use of the phrase “orgasm.”
“You had faked an orgasm,” Werksman mentioned. “It was not lengthy. This isn’t When Harry Met Sally.” Siebel Newsom mentioned, telling Werksman the usage of the phrase orgasm was “so gross.”
In opening statements, Werksman mentioned Siebel Newsom would “be just another bimbo who slept with Harvey Weinstein to get forward in Hollywood” if she did not name herself a sufferer of rape.
Werksman steered in opening statements that two of the ladies’s accounts have been false, whereas the opposite three ladies engaged in “transactional intercourse” with Weinstein to additional their careers.
“Your power is simply so intense, you are simply including issues,” Siebel Newsom informed Werksman, who welcomed her to appropriate him and mentioned she did not reply a few of his questions.